Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Last revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
tutorial:calculating_accumulated_cost_surface_and_least-cost_pathway [2017/01/25 18:35] francisco [What will you learn?] |
tutorial:calculating_accumulated_cost_surface_and_least-cost_pathway [2017/01/25 18:52] francisco [What will you learn?] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 132: | Line 132: | ||
| Click on //[[:Save Map]]// with the Edit Functor, change the folder to an upper level, change the file format to “geotiff” and set **Suffix to Digits** to “0”, finally enter ''railway.tif''. The final model will look as follows: {{ :tutorial:cost10.jpg |}} | Click on //[[:Save Map]]// with the Edit Functor, change the folder to an upper level, change the file format to “geotiff” and set **Suffix to Digits** to “0”, finally enter ''railway.tif''. The final model will look as follows: {{ :tutorial:cost10.jpg |}} | ||
| - | Save the model to a new file ''my_pathway.egoml'', and run it (the model does not run on Dinamica 4, because it is been used two 'different' projections to calculate cost map). This is going to take only a little while. Dinamica EGO has superior performance in relation to most commercial GIS packages; you may want to try this model on other software just for performance comparison. Open on the Map viewer ''railway.tif'', using "PseudoColor" as **Current Color Palette**. What do you see?\\ | + | Save the model to a new file ''my_pathway.egoml'', and run it. This is going to take only a little while. Dinamica EGO has superior performance in relation to most commercial GIS packages; you may want to try this model on other software just for performance comparison. Open on the Map viewer ''railway.tif'', using "PseudoColor" as **Current Color Palette**. What do you see?\\ |
| \\ | \\ | ||
| {{ :tutorial:cost11.2.jpg |}}\\ | {{ :tutorial:cost11.2.jpg |}}\\ | ||